tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7542211131300074280.post6765431107024940814..comments2023-06-24T10:55:47.063-04:00Comments on George Rahal: Elliott Wave for ThoughtUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7542211131300074280.post-7346415615657594782011-09-12T19:26:36.713-04:002011-09-12T19:26:36.713-04:00Thanks for the clarification George!! :)
BestThanks for the clarification George!! :)<br /><br />BestAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7542211131300074280.post-15216389856297830162011-09-12T18:56:24.962-04:002011-09-12T18:56:24.962-04:00The "probable count" is a bear market to...The "probable count" is a bear market to or lower than 2009 lows. I depitcted the idea, not details.George Rahalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02498325227481537656noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7542211131300074280.post-75440795565960539652011-09-12T18:44:15.069-04:002011-09-12T18:44:15.069-04:00Imo the probable count is unlikely (i.e if those l...Imo the probable count is unlikely (i.e if those lows are retested they will not hold,same for 2007-8 highs): that kind of strong bottoming/top formation is not made for "retest" -IMO<br /><br />Best<br />Anon :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7542211131300074280.post-10584502493702691212011-09-12T16:58:49.927-04:002011-09-12T16:58:49.927-04:00In a "flat" correction, wave C would end...In a "flat" correction, wave C would end at 666, the same level that wave A ended. A "zig-zag" would put C below 666.George Rahalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02498325227481537656noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7542211131300074280.post-19036716167818347922011-09-12T15:46:11.501-04:002011-09-12T15:46:11.501-04:00Good work. Chances are, we are in # 2. However, ...Good work. Chances are, we are in # 2. However, straight down is not the only kind of Wave C. Wave C can be a flat - No? 1370 -1020- 1250-1020,... etc.Winhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04040943114916173740noreply@blogger.com